Last friday in drama, we showed our elevator scene to the class. We each had to develop our own character and pair up with other people to create a scene where we get trapped in an elevator. I thought that we could do better because it wasn’t very realistic. If I were really stuck in an elevator with strangers, what would I really do? Another question is what will my character do? I think our group needs to make our characters work together.
Elevator #5 from YIS Arts on Vimeo.
After presenting and discussing our first elevator scene, we have decided to make another one. However, this time, we have changed some parts. Such as showing clear status change; making the characters work together, and being realistic.
8A Elev 2 from YIS Arts on Vimeo.
I think our group improved much better for our scene. We started to think reacted realistically when the elevator stopped. We also had some status change during the scene and our characters met together quite well. My character was more of an easily annoyed person throughout the scene. Overall, I think that we did a good job in reflecting what should/shouldn’t change.
During the past few weeks in Individuals and Societies, we have been working on our new unit: What is progress? In this unit, we’ll learn which countries are more developed and which ones are not. We used gap minder to find out two countries(MEDC/LEDC) of our choice. The following indicators show the comparison of Norway and Sierra Leone.
Birth rate: The first graph; birth rate(population of births) is the total number of births per 1,000 of a population in a year. I found out that by the end of 2013, Sierra Leone had 38 births per 1,000 and a life expectancy of 46 years. But Norway had 12 births and a life expectancy of 82 years. One thing that concerns me is if there were more older people in a country, there are less younger people working.
Population growth: Population growth is the number of how much people increase in a country. You can clearly see that there is a big gap between both countries during the 1990s. This is because of the Civil War that had occurred in Sierra Leone. Many children were involved in the war, leaving hundreds of deaths. The Civil War ended in january 18th of 2002. This made the countries population increase and by the end of 2011, it is as same as Norway.
Infant Mortality Rate: Infant Mortality Rate is the total numbers of 0-5 children dying. The graph shows the infant mortality rate for Norway is higher than hundred. However, the data for Sierra Leone starts from 1950. This means that the numbers of children dying was over three hundred. But towards 2011, both of the countries; especially Norway, decreases their infant mortality rate.
GDP per capita: The more wealthy a country is, the more economically developed. Therefore, if a country is more economically developed, they can provide education, health care, and other resources. Although, in order to gain them, a country needs to increase it’s GDP per capita.
The first thing I noticed was during the 1800s, the life expectancy in Norway went down to 27 years. This is because in 1814, the Swedish-Norweigian War took place. The result was Norway entering union with Sweden. But after the war, the income per person increased to $40, 000(one of the highest countries)as well as the life expectancy(oldest). In this situation, even though the life expectancy decreases, the income per person kept expanding.
On the other hand, the GDP for Sierra Leone did not increase until late 1940s. However, when I thought the country was going to develop more, there was a big change. The income per person went down to $400 but eventually came across t0 $1000.
Human Development Index (HDI): HDI measures how much a country has achieved economically and socially. In 2011, Norway was the world’s most developed country(0.943) leaving Sierra Leone as the least developed country(0.336).
Fertility rate: Fertility rate is the total children per women in a country. In the graph, its shows that Norway wasn’t very stable. This is because in that time, Norway wasn’t as developed as it is now. But as it came towards 2011, Norway had less children per women which made the country at the top of the chart. Sierra Leone also has a big change.
Life expectancy: The life expectancy measures the average of how long people live in a country. What I explained earlier, the life expectancy of Norway increases as the income per person gets bigger. This means that there are more older people than younger generations. This is because the more wealthy a country is, the more energy you could provide which make you live longer. In 1918, the influenza strikes leaving Sierra Leone’s life expectancy to 12 years.
- Literacy Rate: Literacy rate is how much people in a country has the ability to read, write, spell, listen, and speak. The graph shows the literacy rate of the adults(total) in both countries. The indicator didn’t show the literacy rate of Norway. But according to this website , it said 100%(probably higher). The indicator didn’t start until late 2000. Maybe because the country hasn’t made a big change before that. What I found out was that the more educated you are, the more jobs you’ll get which leads to wealth.
Development: In conclusion, I’ll explain the overall development of the indicators in both of the countries. After researching the different data above, it is clear that Norway is a MEDC(more economically developed country) and Sierra Leone is a LEDC(less economically developed country). However, towards 2011, Sierra Leone starts to improve more. Comparing Sierra Leone to Norway, they have a very different environment. Since the environment in Sierra Leone isn’t sanitised, a lot of disease’s develop from the country.
The book I am currently reading is Hatchet by Gary Paulsen. The story starts off where the protagonist of the book, Brian Roberson survives in a plane crash on his way to visit his father. The plane lands on a lake somewhere in Canada and Brian tries to survive alone in the wilderness.
So far, the theme that is said throughout Hatchet is “The only person that can save you is yourself when it comes to survival”. Explaining the theme easily, for example; if you were on an island with three to five people and they all want to go home. If there was an opportunity, people will only care about themselves because they’re suffering to live their own so they wouldn’t bother helping other people.
The first reason why I enjoy reading this book so far is because the protagonist of the book is in the same age group, which is easier for me to understand the story because the vocabularies used aren’t that difficult. Even though the book is in third person, it describes how Brian tries to survive and the difficulty. And while reading the book, I just felt like I was watching him trying to live leaving me useless.
The second reason is that Brian’s parents had divorced and the reason is because of his mother which he calls it “The secret”. “The secret”(which you’ll know if you read the book) still tortures him in his mind after the plane crash. This is a problem that other people might face the same situation where we don’t know why these things happen.
The final reason is because how Brian narrates the story of how he tries to survive drags me in and sort of wish him luck and hope that he will live. And what I explained earlier of how book makes me want to help Brian because he’s left alone somewhere in the wilderness.
In conclusion, I really like this book so far because I have a hard time understanding the stories in books but Hatchet changes that. I hope that I can continue to read this and finish the book. I also hope that Brian will survive in the wilderness of Canada.
Field Studies 2014-2015
We were separated randomly in different groups which was a chance for me to get to meet new people from other classes in our grade. I found out that other people had the same interests and we became friends. Getting to know other people will help me now as well as in the future when I graduate high school and enter college and have to start over again. Not only in college, but also when we find jobs. We have to interact with many people so that we can learn from them instead of always being with the same people.
It wasn’t really a choice to wether or not to get out of our comfort zone. We were forced to be in a group to do different activities for the rest of field studies. Although it was up to ourselves to decide. Stepping out of my comfort zone wasn’t as hard as I thought it would be. People were kind and friendly which made me thought that I should also open-up too.