Under Sea Resources

lanthanum

Chemical element with symbol of LA

neodymium

Neodymium is a chemical element with the symbol Nd and atomic number 60

yttrium

Yttrium is a chemical element with symbol Y and atomic number 39.

From long time ago people have knew that there were resources in the ocean but they didn’t have the definite facts to prove it. People thought that it provide a wealth of rare-metal. It would be molten to fluid with the heat and would be pumped out if possible. However Yasuhiro Kato and his colleague discovered that there are resources under pacific ocean and near hawaii. They’ve found concentrated area of where the resources were. For example there were lanthanum,  neodymium, yttrium. Right now, China is the biggest industrial country that has rare resources and they are making it more expensive so other countries have to pay more. Now more places over the word are mining for the rare resources for example California, Canada, and Australia. People say that mining the ocean floor will take a lot of money and skill. It would cost time too. Also other people say that it will create environmental problems that will make the earth more dirty. I think science of finding out where there are metal/ resources are used in this article. Also they’ve thought about how to drill it out. They calculated how much things it costs when drilling it out. If they can drill the metal out from the ocean floor it will change economic dramatically since they will get a lot of rare metal from the ocean. People who started to drill it out will get really rich. It is beneficial for human being because people would be able to get more rare metal that will create things that are very useful. However it will not be good for the environment because there are possibility that drilling can make the ocean polluted and kill fish and animals.

 

“Deep-Sea Mud Of Pacific Ocean Abundant In Rare Metals.” Asian Scientist Magazine Science Technology and Medicine News Updates From Asia RSS. N.p., n.d. Web. 21 Sept. 2014. <http://www.asianscientist.com/in-the-lab/deap-sea-mud-pacific-ocean-abundant-rare-metals/>.

 

“Lanthanum.” Wikipedia. Wikimedia Foundation, 21 Sept. 2014. Web. 21 Sept. 2014. <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lanthanum

 

“Neodymium.” Wikipedia. Wikimedia Foundation, 21 Sept. 2014. Web. 21 Sept. 2014. <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neodymium>.

“Yttrium.” Wikipedia. Wikimedia Foundation, 21 Sept. 2014. Web. 21 Sept. 2014. <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yttrium>.

6 thoughts on “Under Sea Resources

  1. I think that you did a very good job, there was a lot of relevant information that was easy to understand and easy to read. I think that you could have organised your paragraphs better.

  2. I think it’s a good blog post with a lot of information about the article, I read the same one 🙂
    I really like how you put everything together in a paragraph, and how all the information is in it. However, on the rubric it says to use scientific words, but I don’t think you did that most of the time. IT”S REALLY GOOD THOUGH 🙂

  3. You summarised the article that is understandable and you successfully defined at least 3 vocabularies although you forgot to mention them in your writing. Overall, by reading your post, I can see that you have clearly understood the article. Good job !

  4. I think you did a good job on describing all the details nicely. It was nice how you wrote every point in a paragraphical sentence.All of your resources were in MLA format and you gave good detail.I think you did #1 nicely for the criteria.

  5. I think you explained the positive and negative effects of undersea drilling really well. Something I would add is to divide your text into paragraphs to make it easier to read.

  6. I thought this was a great summary of an interesting article about rare metals in the sea. You included some great points such as how we can make many more things and that the economy will drastically change. Also, you included negative points such as pollution. Overall, you had all things necessary such as MLA and the effect on the environment. Maybe check your grammar.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *